The simplicity of UCG
is very attractive but the application of the concept
as a large-scale method of coal conversion has proved
more difficult.
It is clear
from previous tests that the natural permeability
of the coal seam to transmit the gases to and from
the combustion zone can be unreliable. Methods such
as reversed combustion and hydrofracing can be used
to improve the flow path. For gasification over
long distances in the coal seam, a properly constructed
in-seam channel is preferre, before the coal seam
is ignited and the gasification cavity is developed.
Various methods have been attempted to construct
the in-seam channel including:
- Drilling
from an outcrop
- Slant
drilling from the surface
- Constructing
man-made in-seam galleries
- Directional
drilling
These methods
have all been used in the various trials and commercial
projects that have taken place, but until recently
no consensus had emerged that well construction
for UCG was a reliable or cost effective process.
The technology
of directional underground drilling advanced considerably
in the 1990's as a result of developments in the
oil and gas industries. The same technology is being
used regularly for the de-gassing of coal seams
in Australia, South Africa and the United States.
For the first time, in-seam coal wells can be constructed
reliably and accurately, with much less risk of
failure than previously encountered.
Furthermore,
the option of constructing gasification wells in
much deeper coal seams, say over 1000 m, becomes
possible, which has advantages in terms of cavity
growth, power output and environmental benefits.
(including the possibility of CO2 sequestration,
see environmental
factors)